Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you can Peoples Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The area out-of attachment within the people mating. Report on General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Diary from Societal Things, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites paradox: A personal technology you to definitely minimizes personal engagement and you will psychological well-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Number, time, and you may duration of marriage ceremonies and divorces. Newest People Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies regarding closeness, appeal, and partnership: Testing the presumptions of your own triangular idea out of love. Psychological Account, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Impact greatest about carrying out worse: Societal comparisons within intimate relationships. Log out of Character and you will Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit cognition regarding intimate rivalry. Log out-of Personality and you will Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.
A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you will relationship maintenance mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to attractive alternatives: The progressed mindset from dating maintenance. Evolution and you may Person Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data of conflict and agreement within the disturb and you will nondistressed marital couples. Journal of Consulting and you can Medical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. Good., Green, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Dating development online: What’s the larger interest? Record of Societal Factors, 58(1), 9–29.
The many varme litauisk brude til Г¦gteskab benefits of confident illusions: Idealization therefore the framework regarding fulfillment within the close matchmaking
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research motives into the close dating: A style of in the world improvement and you will particular verification. Into the P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Wisdom ents regarding the study of couple communication (pp. 32–58). New york, NY: Cambridge University Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-specialist thread through the lens away from attachment principle. Psychotherapy: Idea, Browse, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The brand new public keeping track of system: Increased susceptibility in order to social signs while the an adaptive reaction to societal difference. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new social outcast: Ostracism, societal exemption, getting rejected, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Mindset Force.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and certain relational models from the contact with social interactions. Log out-of Personality and you may Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can advice trying to inside the personal matchmaking. Character and you may Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and particular connection representations in the adulthood: Could there be a love?. Journal Of Personal And private Matchmaking, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. For the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Close close matchmaking: Repair and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection truly feeling certainly spouses due to the fact a function of the resemblance in their shared event. Personality And you will Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience out-of extrinsic benefits for the preference and you can enjoying. Record from Identification and you will Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.